A Hague government - what would it mean for business?
|
|
Just weeks ago when the opposition Conservative Party announced its
latest tax plans, nobody listened. Since last week's petrol crisis and a slump
in the Labour government's popularity, business attention has shifted back to
Tory leader William Hague. When Michael Portillo, the Tories' chief treasury spokesman,
announced a ten-point tax plan less than a month ago, he could hardly have
attracted less attention. Today's ICM opinion poll in The Guardian newspaper - coming hard on
the heels of two others at the weekend - has changed all that. According to
ICM, over the course of a week of petrol shortages, the Tories have reversed a
13-point lag and are now four points ahead of the government at 38%. Labour,
now languishing at 34%, is at its lowest ICM level since January 1992. Prime Minister Tony Blair's personal rating has collapsed from plus
two in July to minus 34 - the lowest reading for a Labour Party leader since
the unpopular Neil Kinnock in 1989. With the premier looking so unpopular, businesses have started to
think the previously unimaginable: that Tory leader William Hague may be prime
minister this time next year. What would that mean? The first and most obvious impact would be that the UK would
certainly not join the eurozone in 2002; the stated aim of pro-euro campaign
Britain in Europe, which is close to Blair. Hague's policy is to rule ou
membership for at least his first term in government, which would be due to end
in 2006-07. A survey of manufacturing exporters' opinion published this week by
the Centre for Economic and Business Research found that 27% favoured joining
the eurozone while 25% felt their competitiveness problems would be more easily
solved by the Bank of England cutting interest rates. Portillo, the man who would become finance minister under Hague,
recently set out fairly detailed tax plans although these focused more on wha
the Tories would scrap rather than what they would put in place. Top of the scrap heap would be the Labour government's climate change
levy, a new tax on business energy consumption. Portillo argues that this levy
could cost up to 150,000 jobs in manufacturing industry over the next ten years
and would not even help meet the goals agreed to at the 1997 Kyoto summit on
climate change. Instead, the Tories would introduce legislation to allow
companies to trade pollution permits. As for hated excise duties and value-added tax on petrol - the reason
for last week's 'taxpayers' revolt' - Hague this week carefully avoided any
promises. In a keynote speech to Welsh industrialists, he said: "An assessmen
must be made of the best place to start cutting taxes. Clearly petrol will be a
strong candidate, but other taxes which have led to anger and desperation mus
be considered too." The Tories are being similarly cagey over the notorious IR35 measure
that prevents consultants (often information technology or web design
specialists) who work for one company claiming the tax privileges accorded to
genuinely freelance self-employed operators. IT professionals argue that this
measure will damage the 'new economy'. Portillo has been clearer regarding new proposals contained in a
consultative government paper published today to allow municipal councils to
add an extra 5% to the national business rate. The British Chambers of Commerce
has said this could cost businesses up to 2.75 billion pounds in the next five
years and 1 billion pounds a year after that. Businesses would also be given
six weeks each quarter to submit tax returns. Small business leaders have long complained about the imposition of
new regulations and welfare administration under the Labour government. To
address this problem, Hague has promised a red-tape bonfire. "Regulation has been piled on regulation," he told the Welsh CBI this
week. "Companies are being turned into surrogate benefit offices. Cutting tax
is just one part of a Conservative agenda for business. First, we need to cu
regulations on business and not just talk about it." For a start, Portillo will re-convert the working families tax credi
to a benefit would spare business the estimated 100 million pounds in
administration costs. Moreover, the Tories would kick off an 'independent audit' into the
total cost of regulation to the economy and then set declining regulatory
budgets for each government department. This programme would aim to bring down
the cost of regulation year on year. Business will have to await the next set of polls to judge whether
the post-crisis surveys were one-offs or whether Hague really will get a chance
to carry out this radical agenda.
|